Difference between revisions of "Virtual cache"

From GeoWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Virtual geocache.jpg|thumb|right|A [[Geocacher]] logging a [[Virtual Cache]]]]
+
{{GCA}}
  
A [[Virtual Cache]] is a [[Geocache]] that is placed where it wouldn't be appropriate or possible to place a physical [[Geocache]].
+
[[Image:Virtual geocache.jpg|thumb|right|A [[Geocacher]] logging a [[Virtual cache]]]]
  
A [[Virtual Cache]] usually requires photographic proof and an email to the cache owner.   Most often, the owner will want some piece of information supplied that will prove to them that you visited the site.
+
A [[Virtual cache]] is a [[Cache type|type of cache]] that has no physical container.
 +
This is usually done because it would be inappropriate to place a physical container at the location.
 +
Reasons for this include:
 +
* area is of historical importance
 +
* area of cultural sensitivity
 +
* it's an environmentally sensitive location
 +
* the land owner does not want caches left there
 +
* there is generally no room for a decent sized cache ( a [[Multi-cache]] might still be suitable)
  
[http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?wp=GC633A Piggy Strikes Gold] is an example of a Virtual Cache.
+
The last point can be countered with an offset of multi-cache where you collect some information from the place of interest and then head somewhere else to find the container. That will depend on how far you need to travel to get to the actual physical cache. Quite a few people will expect it to be within walking distance, but that's not always possible. Multi-caches are not quite as popular as traditional caches and virtual caches probably fall behind Multi-caches in the range of popularity.
  
[[Category:Glossary]]
+
As a rule of thumb, most people prefer the physical cache to a virtual cache, so wherever you get the chance to list a physical cache, the community would appreciate those a lot more than a virtual cache. The ultimate choice on whether to list a virtual or physical ([[Multi-cache]]) reside with the cache placer.
  
They were originally designed to allow a cache to be placed in an area where a physical cache is not permitted or appropriate. Some [[cache listing website]]s allow them while others such as [http://geocaching.com Groundspeak] are tightening up on their requirements.
+
Logging a virtual caches usually requires proof that you have visited the location, usually in the form of a photograph containing your GPS.
 +
 
 +
New virtual caches are no longer accepted on [[Geocaching.com]], however they are more than welcome at [[Geocaching Australia]].  ([[Waymark]]s are [[Groundspeak]]'s replacement for [[grandfather]]ed virtual caches.)
 +
 
 +
This graph demonstrates the hide / find counts for Virtual caches.
 +
http://geocaching.com.au/stats/graphs/gca/au/2100_cumulative_hides_finds_virtual
 +
 
 +
==Examples==
 +
* [http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?guid=e82cb352-f149-453f-b8ad-e3b1b38dfe4b Pest-Control]
 +
 
 +
==See Also==
 +
* [[Cache type]]s

Latest revision as of 08:42, 29 September 2015

Geocaching Australia
This page contains information specific to Geocaching Australia.
A Geocacher logging a Virtual cache

A Virtual cache is a type of cache that has no physical container. This is usually done because it would be inappropriate to place a physical container at the location. Reasons for this include:

  • area is of historical importance
  • area of cultural sensitivity
  • it's an environmentally sensitive location
  • the land owner does not want caches left there
  • there is generally no room for a decent sized cache ( a Multi-cache might still be suitable)

The last point can be countered with an offset of multi-cache where you collect some information from the place of interest and then head somewhere else to find the container. That will depend on how far you need to travel to get to the actual physical cache. Quite a few people will expect it to be within walking distance, but that's not always possible. Multi-caches are not quite as popular as traditional caches and virtual caches probably fall behind Multi-caches in the range of popularity.

As a rule of thumb, most people prefer the physical cache to a virtual cache, so wherever you get the chance to list a physical cache, the community would appreciate those a lot more than a virtual cache. The ultimate choice on whether to list a virtual or physical (Multi-cache) reside with the cache placer.

Logging a virtual caches usually requires proof that you have visited the location, usually in the form of a photograph containing your GPS.

New virtual caches are no longer accepted on Geocaching.com, however they are more than welcome at Geocaching Australia. (Waymarks are Groundspeak's replacement for grandfathered virtual caches.)

This graph demonstrates the hide / find counts for Virtual caches. http://geocaching.com.au/stats/graphs/gca/au/2100_cumulative_hides_finds_virtual

Examples

See Also