Difference between revisions of "Traditional cache"
From GeoWiki
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
The reason for calling them traditional is; the first few original locations were created and placed in this fashion. | The reason for calling them traditional is; the first few original locations were created and placed in this fashion. | ||
A container, of regular or average size was hidden in the location,and the GPS co-rdinates (Waypoint) taken. This waypoint and location were listed on one of the [geocaching sites]. These hides did not involve any puzzle solving or multiple locations. | A container, of regular or average size was hidden in the location,and the GPS co-rdinates (Waypoint) taken. This waypoint and location were listed on one of the [geocaching sites]. These hides did not involve any puzzle solving or multiple locations. | ||
| − | So a [traditional] | + | So a [traditional cache] is one that has a single waypoint and is generally of a regular size. It is probably a straightforward walk to [["Ground Zero"]] and search for the cache. |
Caches with multiple waypoints, puzzles or offsets are not traditional. | Caches with multiple waypoints, puzzles or offsets are not traditional. | ||
Revision as of 13:57, 22 June 2005
The reason for calling them traditional is; the first few original locations were created and placed in this fashion.
A container, of regular or average size was hidden in the location,and the GPS co-rdinates (Waypoint) taken. This waypoint and location were listed on one of the [geocaching sites]. These hides did not involve any puzzle solving or multiple locations.
So a [traditional cache] is one that has a single waypoint and is generally of a regular size. It is probably a straightforward walk to "Ground Zero" and search for the cache.
Caches with multiple waypoints, puzzles or offsets are not traditional.
